Manipulating Underdetermination in Scientiac Controversy: The Case of the Molecular Clock

Where there are cases of underdetermination in scientiac controversies, such as the case of the molecular clock, scientists may direct the course and terms of dispute by playing off the multidimensional framework of theory evaluation. This is because assessment strategies themselves are underdetermined. Within the framework of assessment, there are a variety of trade-offs between different strategies as well as shifting emphases as speciac strategies are given more or less weight in assessment situations. When a strategy is underdetermined, scientists can change the dynamics of a controversy by making assessments using different combinations of evaluation strategies and/or weighting whatever strategies are in play in different ways. Following an underdetermination strategy does not end or resolve a scientiac dispute. Consequently, manipulating underdetermination is a feature of controversy dynamics and not controversy closure.